Send us the address and a person goes through it — speed, phone behaviour, technical SEO, local search, broken things and the path a visitor takes to contacting you. You get a written list of what is worth fixing and what is not. No charge, no obligation, and no automated score.
Not a score out of a hundred. A list of specific things, each one with what it costs you and what it would take to fix.
What the page actually weighs, what blocks the first paint, and whether the numbers Google measures for real visitors are passing or failing.
Most of your visitors are on a mid-range Android on mobile data. We look at it the way they do, not on a designer's monitor.
Whether search engines can find, read and correctly attribute your pages. This is the part most sites quietly fail.
Whether a person in your town searching for what you sell has any chance of finding you.
A site that loads fast and ranks well still fails if nobody can work out how to enquire.
The ordinary faults that accumulate and that nobody notices until a customer does.
WhatsApp or the form. If there are pages behind a login, tell us and we will work around them.
By hand, with the tools where tools help. This takes real time, which is why we tell you when we can get to it rather than promising a turnaround we might miss.
What is worth fixing, what is not, and roughly what each one would take. In plain language, ordered by what would actually change your enquiries.
What we will not do. We will not send you a scary automated report to frighten you into a rebuild, we will not invent problems, and we will not tell you that you need a new website when what you need is three fixes to the one you have.
It is free and it is written down, not a call. We do it because a specific, honest list of what is wrong with your site is the most useful thing we can hand someone who has never worked with us. Sometimes that list ends with “nothing here needs us”, and we send it anyway.
It depends on what else is running. We tell you when we can get to it when you ask, rather than publishing a turnaround we would sometimes miss. A small site is usually a couple of working days.
No. The list is yours. You can hand it to whoever built your site, to another agency, or to nobody. We would rather be the people who told you the truth than the people who held the findings hostage.
No. Automated scores are easy to game and they miss the things that actually cost you enquiries — a confusing contact path, a form nobody receives, a page that is fine on a laptop and unusable on a phone. A person goes through it.
That is the usual case. We are not going to spend the review criticising whoever built it. The point is what to do next, not who to blame.
One message with the address is enough. We will come back with what we find and what, if anything, we think you should do about it.